Chat about anything... (as long as it is a sensible debate

)
-
Jachym
- Site Admin

- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:12 pm
- Location: Brno, Czech Republic
- Station model: WH1080
- Software: Meteobridge
-
Contact:
Post
by Jachym » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:25 pm
Hi guys,
do we have any experts on statistics amongst us?
I need to analyze differences between two data samples, basically I have a list of values for about 20 people (before/after) and I want to find out if there is a statistically significant difference between before and after values.
I originally did a paired T-test, but Im now wondering if Wilcoxon test would be more appropriate. Im also a bit unsure about using one- or two-tailed test. The values can change both up and down so I used the two-tailed one, but correct me if Im wrong

-
kocher
- Language Admin

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:14 pm
- Station model: Davis Pro 2
- Software: Weather Display
Post
by kocher » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:48 pm
I speak as an amateur statistics.
I believe that, in this case, the correct test is:
T-dependent test for paired samples
When the distribution of data is asymmetric (that is, the distribution is biased) or the distribution has very large tails, then the Wilcoxon ranks test (also known as the Mann-Whitney U-test) may have three to four times more statistical power than a t test (Student t test,)
"The mind is like a parachute ... It only works if we have it open.". - Albert Einstein
-
Jachym
- Site Admin

- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:12 pm
- Location: Brno, Czech Republic
- Station model: WH1080
- Software: Meteobridge
-
Contact:
Post
by Jachym » Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:05 pm
Hi,
thanks, I used t-test because it is built-in to Excel and easier to use, but Im now looking at the data and the problem is that there is only 20 values.
What would you use if you wanted to test results before/after, where the data looks like this (in the same order):
Before:
Before:
96 77 82 70 94 61 96 97 93 95 65 85 77 97 91 86 96 77 94 84
After:
94 88 86 79 95 62 94 93 95 96 76 82 86 98 94 77 100 82 91 91
-
kocher
- Language Admin

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:14 pm
- Station model: Davis Pro 2
- Software: Weather Display
Post
by kocher » Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:30 pm
Give me a little time, I'll study it
"The mind is like a parachute ... It only works if we have it open.". - Albert Einstein
-
Jachym
- Site Admin

- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:12 pm
- Location: Brno, Czech Republic
- Station model: WH1080
- Software: Meteobridge
-
Contact:
Post
by Jachym » Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:52 pm
Thanks Javier! I really appreciate your help. I want to have someone else's opinion, you know what I mean.
Basically I have test scores like this from 20 people before and after. And I want to see if the values are different after.
Im then also thinking about doing a different statistic, where I would compare male and female scores, in this case however I would compare them in general - i.e. if there was a difference between initial scores boys/girls and that would then be an unpaired test - again, not sure it T-Test is ideal for this...
-
kocher
- Language Admin

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:14 pm
- Station model: Davis Pro 2
- Software: Weather Display
Post
by kocher » Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:26 pm
The calculations were performed with MedCalc software (an excellent statistical program, especially focused on biostatistics).
I performed the Student T and the Wilcoxon T for paired samples
T-test:
Wilcoxon-Test:
I think you can state that there is no difference between the two samples, since p>0.05
Last edited by
kocher on Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"The mind is like a parachute ... It only works if we have it open.". - Albert Einstein
-
Jachym
- Site Admin

- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:12 pm
- Location: Brno, Czech Republic
- Station model: WH1080
- Software: Meteobridge
-
Contact:
Post
by Jachym » Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:28 pm
Hi Javier,
yes I understand, thanks a lot, but I actually have a lot more samples, I can do the tests myself (I dont have such fancy SW

), but I was just thinking if you could tell me which one you would say is better to use for this, more appropriate. I currently have everything calculated with t-test, but Im thinking that maybe there is not enough data and not normally distributed, in which case the WIlcoxon would be better
-
kocher
- Language Admin

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:14 pm
- Station model: Davis Pro 2
- Software: Weather Display
Post
by kocher » Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:51 pm
Jachym wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:28 pm
Hi Javier,
yes I understand, thanks a lot, but I actually have a lot more samples, I can do the tests myself (I dont have such fancy SW

), but I was just thinking if you could tell me which one you would say is better to use for this, more appropriate. I currently have everything calculated with t-test, but Im thinking that maybe there is not enough data and not normally distributed, in which case the WIlcoxon would be better
I agree, the appropriate statistical would, in this case, the Wilcoxon test
"The mind is like a parachute ... It only works if we have it open.". - Albert Einstein
-
Jachym
- Site Admin

- Posts: 1686
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:12 pm
- Location: Brno, Czech Republic
- Station model: WH1080
- Software: Meteobridge
-
Contact:
Post
by Jachym » Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:58 pm
Thanks!
I tried to make my life easier

(easier to do a T-test in excel), but then my ambition for perfection when it comes to statistics stepped in and I changed my mind

-
kocher
- Language Admin

- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:14 pm
- Station model: Davis Pro 2
- Software: Weather Display
Post
by kocher » Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:15 pm
Jachym wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:58 pm
Thanks!
I tried to make my life easier

(easier to do a T-test in excel), but then my ambition for perfection when it comes to statistics stepped in and I changed my mind
An interesting attitude

"The mind is like a parachute ... It only works if we have it open.". - Albert Einstein